As I’ve been blogging about the development of a School
Technology Strategy, I’ve also been reading a recently published book called The
Learning Edge by Bain and Weston. It’s a stimulating read in this context because
it positions education as failing technology rather than the traditional reverse. That might not immediately chime with readers but bear with me. A few
days ago I also read an interesting blog
post by Wes Miller in which he explored the concept of ‘Premature
Innovation’ in the context of Microsoft. The combination of these two sources
has got me thinking...
Bain & Weston take the reader back to the work of Benjamin Bloom, the
famous Educational Psychologist who in 1984 published ‘The 2 Sigma Problem:
The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring’.
In short, Bloom argued that one-to-one tutoring was the most efficient paradigm
for learning but that, at scale, it is not practical or economical. He went on
to say that optimising a relatively small number of significant variables may
in fact allow group instruction to approach the efficiency of one-to-one
tutoring. In this context, of particular interest is whether technology might simulate
one-to-one tutoring effects such as reinforcement, the feedback-corrective loop
and collaborative learning.
The promise of technology in education to date has almost always
exceeded delivery and the blame has usually been attributed to technology. But is it really all the fault of
technology? Well, Bain & Weston make a very interesting point in the
context of Bloom’s research: although Bloom gave us a
very useful framework for educational reform, there has been little systematic
change in classroom practice for decades. The didactic model is still the
beating heart of most schools. The practical implementation of research-based enhancements
to pedagogy and curricula in schools has been painfully slow. In a very real
sense, technology is the gifted student, sitting at the front with a straight
back and bright eyes, full of enthusiasm, and being studiously ignored by educators. Education is failing technology.
Is this the whole
story? Well, I certainly think it’s impossible to divorce a school
technology strategy from an educational strategy with associated pedagogical and
curricular implications. They go hand in hand. For example, a 1:1 ratio of
devices to students is not going to make much of dent in learning in a school if
the underlying pedagogy is predominantly teacher-led (for example). Technology will
only ever leverage the benefits of a sound educational strategy and its practical manifestation. The biggest
challenge for school leaders is therefore to construct a rigorous educational
strategy and drive the change required to manifest it using research and data to drive continuous improvement. I see limited
evidence of this in most schools.
If I’ve convincingly shifted the blame away from technology,
perhaps it’s time to balance the scales a little. When reading Bain &
Weston’s book, I was struck by the fact that a lot of the research focused on
technology that I think fundamentally fails education, regardless of the
education strategy. I think bright eyed, bushy tailed technologists sometimes
suffer from premature innovation. This is where a seemingly great idea
isn’t adopted or fails to fulfil its promise. A startling example from Wes
Miller’s blog is the tablet. Tablets have been around for quite a while with very
limited adoption before Apple stepped into the market. They launched the iPad and
now tablet numbers are burgeoning and 1:1 iPad models for schools seem to fill
every other blog post I read. Why?
As Steve Jobs was well aware, technology does not get used
unless it does what it is designed to do really well and certainly better than
a manual option. In a classroom, technology needs to work at the pace of the learner
and/or the teacher. Even a 5 second delay can interrupt the pace and rhythm of
a lesson. It also needs to be intuitive. It is just not fair to expect every
teacher to be a technology expert and there isn’t time for endless training.
Taking the iPad as an example, it’s hugely popular because a two year old can
use it, it’s personal and mobile, wireless technology and the Internet are have
matured sufficiently to fill it up with engaging content, and it is reliable. It’s turbo-charged book. The time is
right.
Another example of a significant product failure in
education due to premature innovation is the Virtual Learning Environment (or Managed
Learning Environment or Learning Platform or Learning Management System). In the
UK a Government agency called Becta
was responsible for creating a functional specification for this product
category. They then used this specification to put in place a framework off
which schools might procure. The problem was that Becta tried to create an all singing,
all dancing specification and it was just far too detailed. The resulting
software created by the market to meet the requirement was therefore horribly over-engineered.
The outcome? A very significant number of VLE products languishing in schools,
not being used because they’re too difficult. A very big waste of money.
Again, in the VLE space we’re beginning to see disaggregation
of the functional components into bite-size and usable chunks rather than a
monolith with all the agility of a super tanker. Platforms are beginning to
emerge which re-aggregate these simple elements into a manageable whole,
retaining and enhancing usability in the process. The result? I’m beginning to see some interesting products in the
VLE space.
Let’s not ever lose sight of the fact that technology is a
tool and that my School Technology Strategy blog posts are implicitly (and now
hopefully explicitly) intended to sit within the context of an educational
strategy that attacks the 2 Sigma challenge with energy and evidence. Without
educational change, the impact of technology on learning will be a placebo
effect [placebo in the sense that there's nothing fundamentally changing but leaders feel better for ticking the technology box]. It is also the case that, even with a sound educational strategy, technology
will only make a difference if it adheres to some very basic principles of
usability and usefulness, a test that most technology in schools still fails.
I agree that educational change is the key.
ReplyDeletePlacebo is where you do nothing and change happens - its the opposite with technology - we spend a lot and do a lot and nothing happens - I think the effect of technology is a smokescreen effect or red herring effect - simply reinforces existing practice.
Thanks for your comment Martin. I've updated the comment about the placebo effect to clarify what I mean but I think, phraseology aside, we're in agreement.
DeleteI think that even now the procurers of systems don't really know what they want.
ReplyDeleteA VLE - what is it, the internet is one for sure. A film is also one IMHO.
A virtual (L) environment is anything which is not real, everything we hear and see leaves its mark and so all non-real environments are VLE's.
Thanks for your comment Dave. As you say, the term VLE covers a broad church (is my mind a VLE?). I agree that procurers are still unsure what they mean by VLE or MLE or LMS or indeed the rest. What I sense though is that there's more mileage in developing a more granular platform in which each customer can define their own VLE.
Delete